基于NFA计算方法的厦门市生态足迹分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (266 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

运用国家生态足迹账户(NFA)计算方法(2010版),计算并分析2000～2009年厦门市的生态足迹和生态承载力,旨在展示国外生态足迹计算方法研究最新进展,更准确地揭示近年厦门市生态足迹和生态承载力状况。结果表明:2000～2009年厦门市人均生态足迹由1.686 9 gha快速增长至3.245 2 gha;人均生态承载力由0.317 2 gha持续下降为0.268 5 gha;生态赤字持续快速扩大,支撑经济发展由需要5.32个厦门变为需要12.09个厦门的生态承载力;碳吸收地在生态足迹结构中始终占据第一位且呈快速扩大趋势,是厦门市生态赤字的主导因素;生态效率呈持续增长趋势,但目前厦门市生态效率还远低于主要发达国家。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	邱寿丰

关键词 ：生态足迹, 生态承载力, 厦门市

Abstract：

Calculation methodology of the National Footprint Accounts (NFA), 2010 Edition, was adopted to calculate and analyze the ecological footprint and biological capacity of Xiamen over 2000-2009. We presented the latest improvements in the calculation methodology for ecological footprint and manifested more accurately the evolution of ecological footprint and biological capacity in Xiamen during the recent years. The results indicated that during the period from 2000 to 2009 in Xiamen, per capita footprint grew rapidly from 1.686 9 gha to 3.245 2 gha; per capita biocapacity kept on declining from 0.317 2 gha to 0.268 5 gha; ecological overshoot expanded quickly, requiring 12.09 times instead of 5.32 times of Xiamen’s biocapacity to support the city’s economic development. As carbon footprint was always the largest contributor to the total footprint among the footprint components and its share rose magnificently, it was a dominant factor resulting in ecological deficit. Although eco-efficiency there increases continuously based on eco-footprint and GDP, it is now far lower than that in the other main developed countries.

Key words： ecological footprint biocapacity Xiamen

收稿日期: 2012-12-25

F062.2

基金资助:福建省社会科学规划项目(2009B067);福建省科技计划重点项目(2008R0055);福建省高校服务海西建设重点项目(闽教高〔2009〕8号);闽江学院专项计划(YHZ10003)

引用本文:

邱寿丰. 基于NFA计算方法的厦门市生态足迹分析[J]. , 2012, 31(6): 652-660.
QIU Shou-feng. Analysis of ecological footprint of Xiamen based on calculation methodology of NFA. , 2012, 31(6): 652-660.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2012/V31/I6/652

[1] Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth [M]. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers, 1996: 9, 61-79.
[2] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Linares A C, et al. Ecological Footprints of Nations: how much nature do they use? how much nature do they have? [EB/OL]. Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio+5 Forum. Toronto: International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, 1997.http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dpu-projects/drivers_urb_change/urb_environment/pdf_Sustainability/CES_footprint_of_nations.pdf. 1997/2010-2-10.
[3] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. National Natural Capital Accounting with the Ecological Footprint Concept [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(3): 375-390.
[4] Wackernagel M, Lewan L, Hansson C.B. Evaluating the Use of Natural Capital with the Ecological Footprint [J]. Ambio, 1999, 28(7): 604-612.
[5] Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D. Establishing National Natural Capital Accounts based on Detailed Ecological Footprint and Biological Capacity Assessments [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3):231-246.
[6] Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Moran D, et al. National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method [EB/OL]. Oakland: Global Footprint Network, 2005. http://www. footprintnetwork.org/ download.php? id=5. 2005-05-25 /008-08-08.
[7] Kitzes J, Peller A, Goldfinger S, et al. Current Methods for Calcualting National Ecological Footprint Accounts [EB/OL]. Oakland: Global Footprint Network, 2007. http://libdspace.biwako.shiga-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10441/1395/2/4-1.pdf. 2007-05-19/2010-02-10.
[8] Ewing B, Reed A, Rizk S M, et al. Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2008 Edition[EB/OL]. Oakland:Global Footprint Network, 2008.http://www.Footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/methodology/. 2010-10-28/2010-02-10.
[9] Ewing B, Reed A, Galli A, et al. Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2010 Edition [EB/OL]. Oakland:Global Footprint Network, 2010. http:www.footprintnetwork.org/images/Uploads/National_Footprint_Accounts_Method_Paper_2010. 2010-10-13/2011-02-15.
[10] 徐中民,张志强,程国栋. 甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J]. 地理学报,2000,55(5): 607-616.
[11] 徐中民,张志强. 可持续发展定量指标体系的分类和评价[J]. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(4): 82-87.
[12] 张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态足迹的概念及计算模型[J].生态经济,2000, (10): 8-10.
[13] 魏媛,吴长勇.基于生态足迹模型的贵州省生态可持续性动态分析[J].生态环境学报,2011, 20(1): 102-108.
[14] 宋宝莉,何东. 基于生态足迹的区域经济可持续发展研究——以成都市为例[J]. 科技进步与对策,2011, 28(3): 34-37.
[15] 汪瑛,邱尔发,王成,贾宝全,郄光发. 三门峡市生态足迹动态分析[J]. 福建林学院学报,2011, 31(1): 18-23.
[16] Global Footprint Network. National Footprint Accounts, 2010 Edition [EB/OL]. Oakland: Global Footprint Network,2010.http://www.footprintnetwork.orgorg/en/index.php/GFN/page/national_Footprint_accounts_License_academic_edition/. 2010-10-13/2011-1-19.
[17] 闫趣君,洪伟,吴承祯,毕晓丽.福建近41年气候变化对自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J].山地学报,2001,19(6): 522-526.
[18] 张勤丽,周晓燕,曾志高,阙泽利.我国竹地板产业的基本情况及展望[J]. 林业科技开发,2002,16(2): 3-5.
[19] 谢鸿宇,王羚郦,陈贤生.生态足迹评价模型的改进与应用[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2008. 44,52-53.
[20] 王若凡. 厦门市生态足迹动态分析[J]. 环境科学与管理,2008,33(9): 150-154.