苏州河浮游植物群落恢复的生境条件研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (529 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

于2005年4月至2006年5月期间对苏州河浮游植物群落及理化因子进行研究,分析了苏州河浮游植物现状及水质现状,并分析两者之间的关系,得出水温、总磷、总氮、COD_cr等理化因子对浮游植物群落有显著影响,且其影响均存在临界值,分别为水温15℃、总磷0.6mg·L^-1、总氮10mg·L^-1、COD_cr20mg·L^-1.即在苏州河的浮游植物群落恢复中,当理化因子小于其相对浮游植物群落的临界值时,小球藻的出现频率低、密度百分比低,梅尼小环藻出现频率高、密度百分比高;而当理化因子大于其相对浮游植物群落的临界值时,小球藻的出现频率高,密度百分比高,梅尼小环藻出现频率低,密度百分比低.因此在对苏州河进行生态恢复时,应考虑到各理化因子对浮游植物影响的临界值,综合权衡各方面因素,确定水质恢复应达到的目标.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	顾笑迎
	由文辉

关键词 ：苏州河, 恢复, 浮游植物

Abstract：

A research on phytoplankton community and physical and chemical factors were conducted from Apr. 2005 to May 2006 in Suzhou Creek, the phytoplankton community status and the water quality status were analyzed, and the relationship between phytoplankton and water quality was also analyzed, the results showed that the water temperature, TP, TN, COD_Cr had significant impact on phytoplankton community and the impact had thresholds which were as follows:water temperature:15℃,TP:0.6 mg·L^-1, TN:10 mg·L^-1, COD_Cr:20 mg·L^-1. In the ecological restoration of Suzhou Creek, when the physical and chemical factors were lower than the thresholds, the appearance frequency and density percentage of Chlorella were low, while the appearance frequency and density percentage of Cyclotella meneghiniana were high; when the physical and chemical factors were higher than the thresholds, the appearance frequency and density percentage of Chlorella were high, while the appearance frequency and density percentage of Cyclotella meneghiniana were low. So the thresholds of physical and chemical factors impacting on phytoplankton should be considered to restore the water quality in Suzhou Creek.

Key words： Suzhou Creek Restoration Phytoplankton Thresholds

收稿日期: 2010-02-25

X524

基金资助:上海市科委资助项目-中心城区河流水质改善与生态修复技术(06231209)

引用本文:

顾笑迎1, 由文辉2*. 苏州河浮游植物群落恢复的生境条件研究[J]. , 2010, 29(1): 30-34.
GU Xiao-ying1, YOU Wen-hui2. Research on the habitat condition of phytoplankton community’s restoration in Suzhou Creek. , 2010, 29(1): 30-34.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2010/V29/I1/30

[1] Cairns J Jr.The new frontier-rehabilitating damaged ecosystem[J].Restoration Ecology,1988,1:1-11.
[2] 金相灿,屠清瑛.湖泊富营养化调查规范(第二版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990:239-252.
[3] 刘冬燕,赵建夫,张亚雷,等.富营养水体生物修复中浮游植物的群落特征[J].水生生物学报,2005,29(2):177-183.
[4] 吴波,陈德辉,徐英洪,等.苏州河浮游植物群落结构及其对水环境的指示作用[J].上海师范大学学报,2006,35(5):64-70.
[5] 郭沛涌,林育真,李玉仙.东平湖浮游植物与水质评价[J].海洋湖沼通报,1997,4:37-42.
[6] 李利强,张建波.洞庭湖浮游哦植物调查与水质评价[J].1999,12(4):14-16.
[7] 钟恒,谢永泉,刘伟灵,等.用藻类评价铬渣污染水体的恢复程度[J].生态科学,1993,2:101-106.
[8] Thomas F C,Micheal R,Meador S D,Porter M Gurtz.Responses of Physical Chemical and Biological Indicators of Water Quality to a Gradient of Agricultural Land Use in the Yakima River Basin[J].Washington,Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2000,6:259-270.
[9] 何国全,韩博平.飞来峡水库蓄水初期浮游植物组成与数量的变化[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(6):657-662.
[10] 方东,许建华,徐实.生态工程治理玄武湖水污染效果的检测与评价[J].环境监测管理与技术,2001,13(6):36-38.
[11] 陆开宏,姚礼一,周少勤,等.杭州西湖引流冲污前后浮游藻类变化及防治富营养化效果评价[J].应用生态学报,1992,3(3):266-272.
[12] 刘冬燕,达良俊,由文辉,等.绥宁河生态修复对粒径分级叶绿素a 的影响[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(6):963-968.
[13] Sparks R.The Upper Misisipi River Restoration of AquaticEcosystems[M].Nat Acad Press.Washington D.C,1992.
[14] 程曦,李小平.淀山湖氮磷营养物20 年变化及其藻类增长响应[J].湖泊科学,2008,20(4):409-419.
[15] 刘宝兴,由文辉.苏州河大型底栖动物群落结构变化[J].生态与农村环境学报,2006,22(3):23-28.
[16] 刘宝兴.苏州河生态恢复过程中底栖动物的研究[D].华东师范大学.2007:12.
[17] 胡鸿钧,魏印心.中国淡水藻类[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1980:4-6.
[18] 韩茂森.淡水浮游生物图谱[M].北京:.农业出版社,1980.
[19] 周凤霞,陈剑虹.淡水微型生物图谱[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
[20] Kormarex J F,B Chlorococcales.In Huber-Pestalozzi G.(ed.)Das phytoplankton des Susswassers 7/1[M].Stuttgart E:Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung,1983.
[21] Uherkovich G.Die Scendesmus-Arten Ungarns[M].Budapest:Akademiai Kiado,1966.
[22] 徐兆礼.东海亚强真哲水蚤种群生态特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1151-1158.
[23] 国家标准局.GB 3838-2002 地表水评价标准[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
[24] 刘冬燕.苏州河生态恢复过程中浮游植物群落的生态学研究[D].华东师范大学.2003:1-2.
[25] 沈韫芬,章宗涉,龚循矩等.微型生物监测新技术[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1990.