2025年05月30日 星期五 首页   |   关于期刊   |   编 委 会   |   投稿指南   |   期刊订阅   |   广告合作   |   联系我们   |   English
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
茂名大雾岭中次生林植被蚯蚓多样性的空间特征
范明铭1, 许忠能2*, 丘明霞3, 黎婉华1, 马霭能1, 黄泽棋1, 黄滔4, 李丰耀1
1. 暨南大学生物工程学系, 广州, 510632; 2. 暨南大学水生生物研究所, 广州, 510632; 3. 广州大学生物系, 广州, 510405; 4. 暨南大学化学系, 广州, 510632
Direction effects on plant diversity, earthworm diversity, and soil organic matter of natural secondary forest in dawuling mountains
FAN Ming-ming1, XU Zhong-neng2, QIU Ming-xia3, LI Wan-hua1, MA Ai-neng1, HUANG Ze-qi1, HUANG Tao4, LI Feng-yao1
1. Department of Biotechnology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632; 2. Institute of Hydrobiology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632; 3. Department of Biology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510405; 4. Department of Chemistry, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632
全文: PDF (436 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

在样方调查的基础上,研究大雾岭天然次生林中大田顶、茄顶两座山东、南、西、北四个坡向植物多样性、蚯蚓多样性和土壤有机质含量。结果表明:大雾岭天然次生林1)乔木总数以南坡偏低,在大田顶、茄顶南坡分别0Ind·m-2和0.06Ind·m-2;各坡向乔木Shannon-Weaver指数在0~2.24之间,Margalef指数在0~3.15之间,乔木多样性指数没有坡向差异;2)灌木总数没有坡向差异,灌木多样性指数南坡最低,Shannon-Weaver指数与Margalef指数在大田顶南坡分别为1.52和1.70,在茄顶南坡则分别为2.05和2.33;3)草本植物总数以南坡最高,在大田顶、茄顶南坡分别有87Ind·m-2与244Ind·m-2;草本植物多样性指数以南坡较高,其中Shannon-Weaver指数与Margalef指数在大田顶南坡分别为2.46与3.36;4)蚯蚓总数以南坡偏低,在大田顶与茄顶分别为7Ind·m-2和0Ind·m-2;各坡向蚯蚓Shannon-Weaver指数在0~1.63之间,Margalef指数在0~2.20之间,蚯蚓多样性指数没有坡向差异:5)土壤有机质无坡向差异,各坡向离地面50cm以内的土壤有机质含量在11.2~40.6%,离地面0.5~1m的有机质含量在5.6~17.5%。由于生物资源分布有坡向差异,因此在天然次生林管理时可根据不同的坡向选择相应的开发或保护模式。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
范明铭
许忠能
丘明霞
黎婉华
马霭能
黄泽棋
黄滔
关键词 大雾岭次生林坡向生物多样性    
Abstract

Investigations were made on plant diversity, earthworm diversity, and soil organic matter in different directions of natural secondary forest in Dawuling Mountains. Four slopes,east-facing slope (EFS),south-facing slope (SFS),west-facing slope (WFS), and north-lacing slope (NFS) of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill,were sampled. In the Dawuling Mountain, 1)the number of tree was lower on SFS that other directions, the densities of on SFS of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill being 0 Ind·m-2 and 0.06 Ind·m-2, respectively, but there was no difference of tree diversity among directions, Shannon-Weaver index of tree ranging from 0 to 2.24, Margalef index from 0 to 3.15; 2) the number of shrub was not dominant in any directions, but SFS had the lowest shrub diversity, Shannon-Weaver index and Margalef index of SFS of Datianding Hill being 1.52 and 1.70, respectively, those of Qieding Hill being 2.05 and 2.33, respectively; 3) the number of herb on SFS was the highest among those or all directions, the densities of herb on SFS of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill being 87 Ind·m-2, and 44 Ind·m-2,respectively, and SFS also had the highest herb diversity, Shannon-Weaver index and Margalef index of herb on SFS of Datianding Hill being 2.46 and 3.36, respectively; 4) the number of earthworm was low on SFS. the densities of earthworm on SFS of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill being 7 Ind·m-2 and 0 Ind·m-2, respectively, but the earthworm diversities was insignificantly influenced by direction, Shannon-Weaver index of earthworm ranging from 0 to 1.63. Margalef index from 0 to 2.20; and 5) direction had no influence on the content of soil organic matter, and the soil within 50 cm from the surface had 11.2~40.6% of organic matter, that between 50 cm and 100 cm from the surface having 5.6~17.5% of organic matter. Because of direction effects on biological sources, different methods should be used to manage natural secondary forest according to slope-exposure.

Key wordsDawuling Mountains    Secondary forest    Direction    Biodiversity
收稿日期: 2003-08-25     
:  Q145+.2  
基金资助:共青团暨南大学委员会“挑战杯”基金
引用本文:   
范明铭1, 许忠能2*, 丘明霞3, 黎婉华1, 马霭能1, 黄泽棋1, 黄滔4, 李丰耀1. 茂名大雾岭中次生林植被蚯蚓多样性的空间特征[J]. , 2003, 22(4): 294-299.
FAN Ming-ming1, XU Zhong-neng2, QIU Ming-xia3, LI Wan-hua1, MA Ai-neng1, HUANG Ze-qi1, HUANG Tao4, LI Feng-yao1. Direction effects on plant diversity, earthworm diversity, and soil organic matter of natural secondary forest in dawuling mountains. , 2003, 22(4): 294-299.
链接本文:  
 http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2003/V22/I4/294
粤ICP备17056760号-3   版权所有 © 《生态科学》编辑部
地址:广州市天河区暨南大学 邮编:510630 E-mail:ecolsci@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn