茂名大雾岭中次生林植被蚯蚓多样性的空间特征

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (436 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

在样方调查的基础上,研究大雾岭天然次生林中大田顶、茄顶两座山东、南、西、北四个坡向植物多样性、蚯蚓多样性和土壤有机质含量。结果表明:大雾岭天然次生林1)乔木总数以南坡偏低,在大田顶、茄顶南坡分别0Ind·m^-2和0.06Ind·m^-2;各坡向乔木Shannon-Weaver指数在0～2.24之间,Margalef指数在0～3.15之间,乔木多样性指数没有坡向差异;2)灌木总数没有坡向差异,灌木多样性指数南坡最低,Shannon-Weaver指数与Margalef指数在大田顶南坡分别为1.52和1.70,在茄顶南坡则分别为2.05和2.33;3)草本植物总数以南坡最高,在大田顶、茄顶南坡分别有87Ind·m^-2与244Ind·m^-2;草本植物多样性指数以南坡较高,其中Shannon-Weaver指数与Margalef指数在大田顶南坡分别为2.46与3.36;4)蚯蚓总数以南坡偏低,在大田顶与茄顶分别为7Ind·m^-2和0Ind·m^-2;各坡向蚯蚓Shannon-Weaver指数在0～1.63之间,Margalef指数在0～2.20之间,蚯蚓多样性指数没有坡向差异:5)土壤有机质无坡向差异,各坡向离地面50cm以内的土壤有机质含量在11.2～40.6%,离地面0.5～1m的有机质含量在5.6～17.5%。由于生物资源分布有坡向差异,因此在天然次生林管理时可根据不同的坡向选择相应的开发或保护模式。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	范明铭
	许忠能
	丘明霞
	黎婉华
	马霭能
	黄泽棋
	黄滔

关键词 ：大雾岭, 次生林, 坡向, 生物多样性

Abstract：

Investigations were made on plant diversity, earthworm diversity, and soil organic matter in different directions of natural secondary forest in Dawuling Mountains. Four slopes,east-facing slope (EFS),south-facing slope (SFS),west-facing slope (WFS), and north-lacing slope (NFS) of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill,were sampled. In the Dawuling Mountain, 1)the number of tree was lower on SFS that other directions, the densities of on SFS of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill being 0 Ind·m^-2 and 0.06 Ind·m^-2, respectively, but there was no difference of tree diversity among directions, Shannon-Weaver index of tree ranging from 0 to 2.24, Margalef index from 0 to 3.15; 2) the number of shrub was not dominant in any directions, but SFS had the lowest shrub diversity, Shannon-Weaver index and Margalef index of SFS of Datianding Hill being 1.52 and 1.70, respectively, those of Qieding Hill being 2.05 and 2.33, respectively; 3) the number of herb on SFS was the highest among those or all directions, the densities of herb on SFS of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill being 87 Ind·m^-2, and 44 Ind·m^-2,respectively, and SFS also had the highest herb diversity, Shannon-Weaver index and Margalef index of herb on SFS of Datianding Hill being 2.46 and 3.36, respectively; 4) the number of earthworm was low on SFS. the densities of earthworm on SFS of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill being 7 Ind·m^-2 and 0 Ind·m^-2, respectively, but the earthworm diversities was insignificantly influenced by direction, Shannon-Weaver index of earthworm ranging from 0 to 1.63. Margalef index from 0 to 2.20; and 5) direction had no influence on the content of soil organic matter, and the soil within 50 cm from the surface had 11.2～40.6% of organic matter, that between 50 cm and 100 cm from the surface having 5.6～17.5% of organic matter. Because of direction effects on biological sources, different methods should be used to manage natural secondary forest according to slope-exposure.

Key words： Dawuling Mountains Secondary forest Direction Biodiversity

收稿日期: 2003-08-25

Q145+.2

基金资助:共青团暨南大学委员会“挑战杯”基金

引用本文:

范明铭1, 许忠能2*, 丘明霞3, 黎婉华1, 马霭能1, 黄泽棋1, 黄滔4, 李丰耀1. 茂名大雾岭中次生林植被蚯蚓多样性的空间特征[J]. , 2003, 22(4): 294-299.
FAN Ming-ming1, XU Zhong-neng2, QIU Ming-xia3, LI Wan-hua1, MA Ai-neng1, HUANG Ze-qi1, HUANG Tao4, LI Feng-yao1. Direction effects on plant diversity, earthworm diversity, and soil organic matter of natural secondary forest in dawuling mountains. , 2003, 22(4): 294-299.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2003/V22/I4/294

[1] 黄世国,林思祖,曹光球,等.2001.不同生境中杉阔混交林物种多样性特征初步研究[J].生物多样性,9(2):162-167.

[2] 沈泽昊,张新时,金义兴.2000.三峡大老岭森林物种多样性的空间格局分析及其地形解释[J].植物学报,42(6):620-627.

[3] 郭晋平,王俊田,李世光.2000.关帝山林区景观要素沿环境梯度分布趋势的研究[J].植物生态学报,24(2):135-140.

[4] 陈桂珠.1997.大雾岭省级自然保护区综述[M].大雾岭省级自然保护区综合考察文集.

[5] 娄安如.1996.神农架3种天然次生林的种群结构和演替趋势[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),32(1):124-128.

[6] 沈泽昊,张新时.2000.基于植物分布地形格局的植物功能型划分研究[J].植物学报,42(11):1190-1196.

[7] 张宝贵,李贵桐,申天寿.2000.威廉环毛蚓对土壤微生物量及活性的影响.生态学报,20(1):168-172.

[8] 姜培坤,钱新标,余树金,等.1999.千岛湖地区天然次生林地枯落物与土壤状况地调查分析[J].浙江林学院学报,16(3):260-264.

[9] Meir F,ori F,Eviatar N.2001.Biodiversity and interslope divergence of vascular plants caused by sharp microclimatic differences at "Evolution Canyon Ⅱ",Lower Nahal Keziv,Upper Galilee,Israel[J].Israel Journal of Plant Sciences,49(4):285-295.

[10] Huston M.1994.Biological diversity,soils,and economics[J]Science,262:1676-1679.

[11] Ludwig K.2002.Perspectives on secondary forest management in tropical humid lowland America[J].Ambio,31(3):243-250.

[12] Zarin D J,Ducey M J,Tucker J M,et al.2001.Potential biomass accumulation in Amazonian regrowth forests[J].Ecosystems,4(7):658-668.

[13] Nachtergale L,Ghekiere K,De Schrijver A,et al.2002.Earthworm biomass and species diversity in windthrow sitesof a temperate lowland forest[J].Pedobiologia,46(5):440-451.

[14] Compton J E,Boone R D.2002.Soil nitrogen transfo rmations and the role of light fraction organic matter in fo rest soils[J].Soil biology & Biochemistry,34(7):933-943.

[15] Singh G,Singh B,Kuppusamy V,et al.2002.Variations in foliage and soil nutrient composition in Acacia tortilis planatationof different ages in north-western Rajasthan[J].Indian Forester,128(5):514-522.

[16] Kaiser K,Eusterhues K,Rumpel C,et al.2002.Stabilizationoforganic matter by soil minerals:Investigations of density and particle-size fractions from two acid forest soils[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,165(4):451-459.

[17] Critchley C N R,Chambers B J,Fowbert J A,et al.2002.Plant species richness,functional type and soil properties of grasslands and allied vegetation in English environmentally sensitive areas[J].Grass and Forage Science,57(2):82-92.

[18] Wezel A,Steinmueller N,Friederichsen J R.2002.Slope position effects on soil fertility and crop productivity and implications for soil conservation in upland northwest Vietnam[J].Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,91(1-3):113-126.

[19] Heredia W,Peitano P,Borie G,et al.2002.Soil organic matter-metal interactions in Chilean volcanic soils under different agronomic management[J].Communicationsin Soil Science and Plant Analysis,33(13-14):2083-2099.