浙西南地区沉水植物的区系分布与物种多样性

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (485 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

2007～2008年对浙西南地区的婺江、衢江及瓯江流域沉水植物的种类组成、区系类型及群落特征进行了调查研究。结果表明:(1)该地区共有沉水植物6科8属19种,在属水平上可归纳为3个区系类型,在种水平上可分为7个区系类型,并且在属种水平上的主要分布类型不同。(2)9个典型样地的13个群落类型进行了β-、γ-多样性分析。群落间β-多样性Jaccard指数显示89.8%群落间的相似性低于0.5,各样地的y-多样性则在衢江水域为最高(14种),瓯江水域最低(9种),这与不同水域沉水群落分布的研究结果相一致。并认为该地区沉水植物多样性降低是环境因子与人为干扰共同作用的结果。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	乔宁宁
	李铭红
	王宇
	朱丹婷

关键词 ：浙西南地区, 沉水植物, 区系分布, 物种多样性

Abstract：

The species composition, floristic distribution, and characteristics of submerged plant community in Wu River, Qu River and Ou River in the southwest of Zhejiang Province were surveyed during 2007 and 2008.The results showed that:(1) There were 19 species belonging to 6 families and 8 genera.Three areal-types were classified from these genera, and 7 areal-types were classified from species, and the main distribution types between these two levels were different.(2) Thirteen submerged plant communities in 9 typical sites were analyzed by β- and γ- diversity indexes.The β- diversity Jaccard index showed the species comparability of 89.2% communities was lower than 0.5.The highest γ- diversity index(14 species) was found in Qu River, while the lowestγ-diversity index(9 species) was observed in Ou River, which was consistent with the community distribution in other different rivers.It suggests that the low diversity of submerged plants in this area is due to interaction of environment factors and disturbance of human activities.

Key words： southwest of Zhejiang Province submerged macrophyte floristic distribution species diversity

收稿日期: 2009-10-25

Q948.1

基金资助:浙江省科技计划项目(编号:2008C23093)资助

引用本文:

乔宁宁, 李铭红*, 王宇, 朱丹婷, 兰佳. 浙西南地区沉水植物的区系分布与物种多样性[J]. , 2009, 28(5): 404-409.
QIAO Ning-ning, LI Ming-hong, WANG Yu, ZHU Dan-ting, LAN Jia. The Floristic Distribution and Species Diversity of Submerged Plant in the Southwest of Zhejiang Province. , 2009, 28(5): 404-409.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2009/V28/I5/404

[1] 金相灿.2001.湖泊富营养化控制和治理技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 121.
[2] 苏胜齐, 姚维志.2002.沉水植物与环境关系评述[J].农业环境保护, 21(6):570-573.
[3] 全为民, 沈新强, 严力蛟.2003.富营养化水体生物净化效应的研究进展[J].应用生态学报, 14(11):2057-2061.
[4] Higuchi H, Primack R.Conservation and management of biodiversity in Japan:An introduction[J].Biological Conservation, doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.011.
[5] 彭映辉, 简永兴, 王建波, 等.2004.湖北省五大湖泊水生植物多样性的比较研究[J].水生生物学报, 5(28):464-470.
[6] 谢平, 陈宜瑜.1996.我国内陆水体中的"魔鬼四重奏"-生物多样性的丧失与人类活动[J].水生生物学报(增刊), 20:6-21.
[7] 彭映辉, 倪乐意, 简永兴, 等.2004.两湖平原六个湖泊水生植物多样性的比较研究[J].云南植物研究, 26(2):191-198.
[8] 简永兴, 王建波, 何国庆, 等.2002.洞庭湖区三个湖泊水生植物多样性的比较研究[J].水生生物学报, 26(2):160-167.
[9] 任南, 严国安, 马剑敏.1996.环境因子对东湖几种沉水植物生理的影响研究[J].武汉人学学报(自然科学版), 42(2):213-218.
[10] 种云霄.2005.利用沉水植物治理水体富营养化[J].广州环境科学, 20(3):41-43.
[11] 任长久, 周红, 孙办彤.1997.滇池光照强度的垂直分布与沉水植物的光补偿深度[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版), 33(2):211-214.
[12] 马凯, 蔡庆华, 谢志才, 等.2003.沉水植物分布格局对湖泊水环境N、P因子影响[J].水生生物学报, 27(3):232-237.
[13] 齐代华.2007.九寨沟水生植物物种多样性及其环境关系研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 22.
[14] 孙祥钟.1992.中国植物志(第八卷)[M].北京:科学出版社, 40-185.
[15] 郑朝宗.2005.浙江种子植物检索鉴定手册[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社.66-414.
[16] 颜素珠.1983.中国水生高等植物图说[M].北京:科学出版社, 26-217.
[17] 吴征镒.1991.中国种子植物属的分布区类型[J].云南植物研究增刊Ⅳ:1-139.
[18] 马克平, 刘灿然, 刘玉明.1995.牛物群落多样件的测度方法Ⅱβ-多样性的测度方法[J].生物多样性, 3(1):38-43.
[19] 徐新伟, 吴中华, 于丹, 等.2002.汉江中下游水牛植物多样性及南水北调上程对其影响[J].生态学报, 22(11):1933-1938.
[20] 何景彪.1989.试论水生植被的地理分布规律[J].武汉人学学报(自然科学版), (4):109-113.
[21] 丁炳扬, 张庆勉, 方云亿.2001.浙江淡水维管束植物的区系特点与地理分布[J].水生生物学报, 25(2):128-136.
[22] Kadono Y.1982.Distribution and habimt of Japanese Potamogeton[J].Journal ofPlant Research, 95:63-76.
[23] Clayton J, Edwards T.2006.Aquatic plants as environmental indicators of ecological condition in New Zealand lakes[J].Hydrobiologia, 570:147-151.
[24] 李伟.1997.洪湖水生维管束植物区系研究[J].武汉植物学研究, 15(2):113-122.
[25] Ye C, Xu Q J, Kong H N, et al.2007.Eutrophication conditions and ecological status in typical bays of Lake Taihu in China[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 135:217-225.
[26] 吴振斌, 邱东茹, 贺锋, 等.2003.沉水植物重建对富营养水体氮磷营养水平的影响[J].应用生态学报, 14(8):1351-1353.
[27] Fox A M, Murphy K J.1990.The efficacy and ecological impacts of herbicide and cutting regimes on the submerged plant communities of four British rivers.I.A comparison of management efficacies[J].Journal of Applied Ecology, 27:520-540.