北京四校园人工湖浮游藻类与富营养化特征分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (710 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

浮游藻类作为重要的生物指标已被广泛运用于各种水体的富营养化监测与评价中.论文对北京市4个校园人工湖的浮游藻类群落组成及季节变化展开调查,探讨了浮游藻类生物指标和富营养化的关系及其季节变化规律.调查期间,镜鉴得到39个属,隶属于蓝藻,绿藻和硅藻门.4个水体生物密度的季节平均值均高于500 cell·mL^-1,多样性指数普遍介于2～3之间.TN,TP和COD显示各水体都已处于富营养化状态.综合生物指标和水质指标进行聚类分析,结果显示:4个人工湖不同季节的水体可分为绿藻型,蓝,绿藻型和硅藻型三大类富营养化水体:荷花池,荷塘浮游藻类群落相似性最高,而荷塘、未名湖夏季富营养化程度最接近.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张洁
	俞宙菲
	李稳
	杨娟

关键词 ：人工湖, 浮游藻类, 富营养化, 聚类分析

Abstract：

The biological indicators of planktonic algae have been widely utilized in the field of monitoring and evaluating eutrophic state of different waters.In this paper,seasonal changes of planktonic alga composition were investigated to explore the relationship between planktonic alga indicators and the eutrophication characteristics of artificial lakes on four campuses in Beijing.During the investigation,39 genera of planktonic algae belonging to Chlorophyceae,Cyanobacteria and Bacillanophyta were identified.Seasonal average phytoplanktonic densities in four lakes were over 500 cell·ml^-1.The biodiversity indices of four lakes across seasons were mostly between two and three.The water quality indicators,TN,TP and COD reflected that four lakes were all in eurtrophic state. However,the evaluation results on eutrophic levels were variable according to different indices.Therefore,cluster analysis was applied to combine the biological indicators and water quality indicators.The results showed that all of the seasonal waters could be classified into three different eutrophic types,according to the phytoplanktonic composition.The characteristics of phytoplankton community were most similar between Hehuachi and Hetang,while the eutrophic levels in summer were close between Hetang and Weiminghu.

Key words： artificial lakes planktonic algae eutrophication cluster analysis

收稿日期: 2011-04-25

X524

基金资助:中国地质大学(北京)教学开放实验室基金

引用本文:

张洁*, 俞宙菲, 李稳, 杨娟. 北京四校园人工湖浮游藻类与富营养化特征分析[J]. , 2011, 30(2): 183-188.
ZHANG Jie, YU Zhou-fei, LI Wen, YANG Juan. Analysis on planktonic alga composition and eutrophication characteristics of artificial lakes on campus. , 2011, 30(2): 183-188.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2011/V30/I2/183

[1] 沈军,周忠泽,陈元启,孙庆业,许李林,赵秀侠,宗梅.安徽升金湖秋季浮游藻类多样性与水质评价[J].生态学杂志,2009,2(3):17-21.

[2] 许金花,潘伟斌,张海燕,城市小型浅水人工湖泊浮游藻类与水质特征研究[J].生态科学,2007,1(26):36-40.

[3] McConnick Paul V,Caims John Jr.Algae as indicators of environmental change[J].Journal of Applied Phycology,1994,6:509-526.

[4] 高玉荣.北京4海藻类群落结构特征与水体营养水平的研究[J].生态学报,1992,12(2):173-180.

[5] Cleber C F,Giani A.Seasonal variation in the diversity and species richness of phytoplankton in a tropical eutropluc reservoir[J].Hydrobiologia,2001,445:165-174.

[6] 钟诗群,徐黎明,张森桥,贵州方竹水库浮游生物多样性与氮、磷分布[J].水生态学杂志,2009,2(6):42-45.

[7] Jacobsen Bodil Aavad,Simonsen Peter.Disturbance events affecting phytoplankton biomass,composition and species diversity in a shallow,eutrophic,temperate lake[J].Hydrobiologia,1993,249.9.14.

[8] 薄芳芳,上海城市绿地景观水体富营养化综合评价研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2009.50-60.

[9] 纪立东,孙权,王丽,银川市景观水道浮游植物及水体营养状态评价[J].安徽农业科学,1999,37(23):11127-11159.

[10] 姜雪芹,禹娜,毛开云,刘一,李二超,陈立侨,冬季上海市城区河道中浮游植物群落结构及水质的生物评价[J].华东师范大学学报自然科学版,2009,(2):78-87.

[11] 胡鸿钧,魏印心.中国淡水藻类[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.1-1023.

[12] 韩茂森,束蕴芳.中国淡水生物图谱[M].北京:海洋出版社,1995.2-83.

[13] 郭劲松,陈杰,李哲,方芳,张超,田光.156m蓄水后三峡水库小江回水区春季浮游植物调查及多样性评价[J].环境科学,2008,29(10).2710-2715.

[14] 李军,刘丛强,肖化云,刘学炎,李友谊,王仕禄,太湖北部夏季浮游藻类多样性与水质评价[J].生态环境,2006,15(3).453-456.

[15] 金相灿,屠清瑛.湖泊富营养化调查规范[M],第二版,北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990.299-302.

[16] 况琪军,马沛明,胡征宇,周广杰.湖泊富营养化的藻类生物学评价与治理研究进展[J].安全与环境学报,2005,5(2):87-91.

[17] 胡晓红,陈椽,李银燕,向刚,刘美珊.以浮游植物评价百花湖水质污染及富营养化[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999,17(4):1-7.

[18] 卫新锋,赵彦伟,彭可扬,王喆,任硕仪.北京市五景观湖泊浮游藻类评价及聚类分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(2):212-215.

[19] 陈立婧,顾静,张饮江.上海世博园白莲泾浮游藻类群落结构和物种多样性的研究[J],上海水产大学学报,2008,17(3):333-338.

[20] 黄祥飞,湖泊生态调查观测与分析[M].北京:中国标准出版社出版,2000.72-79.

[21] 常会庆,车青梅,富营养化水体的评价方法研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(32):10407-10409.

[22] 龚珞军,杨学芬,熊邦喜,熊邦喜,周敏,程成立,武汉市夏季湖泊水体理化指标主成份和聚类分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2009,18(6):550-554.