饮用水处理流程中的微藻及其去除率

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (498 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

为了解某市饮用水处理流程中的藻类状况,对某市饮用水源及自来水厂各主要处理过程中的水样进行藻类检测鉴定。在各水样中共检测到藻类72种,蓝藻、绿藻和硅藻为优势藻群,并检出微囊藻、颤藻和鱼腥藻等潜在产毒的种类,其中微囊藻在源水中的细胞密度为1.9×10⁶cell·L^-1。源水中藻类细胞密度为2.8×10⁶cell·L^-1,处理后自来水中藻类的细胞密度为4.6×10⁴cell·L^-1,藻类总去除率为98.3%,其中滤池对藻类的去除率为82.7%,但其对蓝藻的去除率仅为11.8%。研究结果表明,该市水源可能已受到藻毒素的污染;现有自来水处理工艺中的滤池难以对个体较小的有毒蓝藻有效去除。针对该地区水源藻类的分布情况提出了优化过滤工艺的建议。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	徐景亮
	李爱芬
	段舜山

关键词 ：饮用水, 藻类, 分布, 去除率

Abstract：

In order to investigate the status of algae pollution of municipal water, samples from the source water and the main treatment processes of drinking water in a city were examined. 72 species were identified in various samples. Cyanophyta, Chlorophyta and Bacillariophyta were the dominant groups. Species that have the potential to produce toxins including those in genus Microcystis, Oscillatoria and Anabaena were examined. The cell density of Microcystis was 1.9×10⁶ cell·L^-1 in the source water, after treatment, algal density was 2.8×10⁶ cell·L^-1 in the source water and 4.8×10⁴ cell·L^-1 in the tap respectively. The total algae removal rate was 98.3%, and removal rate by the filter was 82.7%, but the Cyanobacteria removal rate by the filter was only 11.8%. The results also showed that the water source was contaminated with algal toxins. It is difficult to effectively remove the toxic Cyanobacteria with the existing filter. A suggestion to optimize the filtering technology, is suggestted based on the distribution of the local algae.

Key words： Drinking water Algae Distribution Removal rates

收稿日期: 2005-04-25

X171

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(30370231)

引用本文:

徐景亮, 李爱芬, 段舜山*. 饮用水处理流程中的微藻及其去除率[J]. , 2005, 24(2): 120-123.
XU Jing-liang, LI Ai-fen, DUAN Shun-shan. The algal distribution and removal rate in drinking water treatment processes. , 2005, 24(2): 120-123.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2005/V24/I2/120

[1] 王朝晖,许忠能,胡韧,等.2004.地表水中微囊藻毒素的危害与控制(综述)[J].暨南大学学报,25(1):110-114.

[2] 林秋奇,胡韧,段舜山,等.2002.广东省大中型供水水库营养现状及浮游生物的响应[J].生态学报,23(6):1101-1108.

[3] 陈丽芬,胡韧,林秋奇,等.2002.广东沿海与粤北山区中小型水库浮游生物群落比较分析[J].生态科学,21(1):16-20.

[4] 游江涛,林秋奇,胡韧,等.2002.飞来峡水库蓄水初期营养状态及浮游生物分布特征[J].生态科学,21(1):21-24.

[5] 马经安,李红清.2002.浅谈国内外江河湖库水体富营养化状况[J].长江流域资源与环境,11(6):575-578.

[6] LeChevalier M W, Abbaszadegan M, Camper A K, et al.1999. Emerging pathogens-viruses, protozoa, and algal toxins[J]. Journal Ame rican Water Works Association,91(9):110-121.

[7] Duy T N, Lam P K, Shaw G R, et al. 2000. Toxicology and risk assessment of freshwater cyanobacterial(blue-green algal) toxins in water[J]. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 163:113～186.

[8] KiyomiT, Hiroaki M, Hitoshi U, et al. 2001. Analysis of Microcystins in Sediments Using MMPB Method[J].Toxicon, 39(5):687～692.

[9] Gago-Martinez A, Pineiro N, Aguete E C, et al. 2003.Further improvements in the application of high-performance liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis and capillary electrochromatography to the analysis of algal toxins in the aquatic environment[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 992(1-2):159～168.

[10] 施玮,蒋颂辉,朱惠刚.2003.中国饮用水源水中藻类卫生标准的研究[J].卫生研究,32(2):97～100.

[11] 陈慧中,杨宏.2001.给水系统中藻类研究现状及进展[J].现代预防医学,28(1):79～80.

[12] 孟玉珍,张丁,王兴国,等.2001.黄河水源水浮游藻类及藻类毒素污染状况动态研究[J].河南医学研究,10(3):272～274.

[13] 陈晓东,林萍,吕永生,等.2003.饮用水源藻类及其毒素污染与消化系统肿瘤的关系[J].中国公共卫生,19(5):548～550.

[14] 林毅雄,刘秀芬,阎海,等.2001.滇池铜绿微囊藻毒素及其在水体中的变化[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2(5):10～13.

[15] 吴彦领,刘天福,周红,等.2000.以黄河为生活饮用水源的卫生研究(一)——藻类污染及其影响因素的研究[J].河南预防医学杂志,11(2):72～75.

[16] 孟玉珍,张丁,王兴国,等.1999.郑州市水源水藻类和藻类毒素污染调查[J].卫生研究,28(2):100～101.

[17] 章宗涉,黄祥飞.1991.淡水浮游生物研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社.333～335.

[18] 金相灿,屠清瑛.1990.湖泊富营养化调查规范(第二版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社.301～302.

[19] 余国忠,李灵芝,赵明云,等.2003.纤维直接过滤去除原水藻类[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,4(1):14～18.