四种灌木幼苗对水分胁迫的生理响应

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (534 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

柠条锦鸡儿(Caragana korshinskii)、白皮锦鸡儿(C.leucophloea)、刺叶锦鸡儿(C.acanthophylla)和长枝木蓼(Atraphaxis virgata)是乌鲁木齐周边植被组成中的重要植物种,在植被恢复中具有潜在价值。研究通过人工控制水分比较这4种灌木对干旱胁迫的生理响应,结果表明:叶片的组织含水量和叶绿素含量随着干旱胁迫的加剧而降低;脯氨酸在干旱胁迫下的积累程度较可溶性糖大;除刺叶锦鸡儿外其它植物幼苗的丙二醛在干旱胁迫下均无明显的积累(P>0.05)。4种灌木在干旱胁迫下通过渗透调节、保持膜系统稳定等途径维持正常的生理活动,对干旱具有一定的适应能力。4种灌木抗旱能力的排序为白皮锦鸡儿>柠条锦鸡儿>长枝木蓼>刺叶锦鸡儿。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	姚华
	赵晓英
	李晓梅
	赵法

关键词 ：灌木, 幼苗, 干旱胁迫, 渗透调节, 丙二醛, 叶绿素

Abstract：

Caragana korshinskii,C.leucophloea,C.acanthophylla and Atraphaxis virgata are four important species composed of vegetation around Urumqi,and they have a great potential in recovering degraded vegetation.In this study,physiological responses of four shrub seedlings to artificially simulated drought stress were studied.The results showed that leaf water content and chlorophyll content of four shrub seedlings decreased with increased drought stress.Proline accumulation was much more significant than soluble sugars under drought stress conditions.MDA accumulation was not significant (P>0.05) for all shrub seedlings except C.acanthophylla.Our results indicated that four shrubs can adapt to arid environments by adopting different strategies under drought stress conditions,and that drought resistance in descending order of four shrubs was C.leucophloe>C.korshinskii>A.virgata>C.acanthophylla.

Key words： shrub seedling drought stress osmotic adjustment malondialdehyde chlorophyll

收稿日期: 2009-12-25

Q945178

基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(3066035);新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研计划重点项目(XKEDU2007S26);新疆师范大学珍稀濒危物种保护生物学重点实验室;新疆师范大学干旱区湖泊环境与资源重点实验室

引用本文:

姚华, 赵晓英*, 李晓梅, 赵法, 董正武. 四种灌木幼苗对水分胁迫的生理响应[J]. , 2009, 28(6): 537-542.
YAO Hua, ZHAO Xiao-ying, LI Xiao-mei, DONG Zheng-wu. Physiological responses of four shrub seedlings to water stress. , 2009, 28(6): 537-542.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2009/V28/I6/537

[1] 崔乃然.1987.新疆主要饲用植物志[M].第二卷,乌鲁木齐:新疆科技卫生出版社.153-154.

[2] 刘嫫心.1987.中国沙漠植物志[M].第二卷,北京:科学出版社.

[3] 王霞,侯平,尹林克,等.1999.水分胁迫对柽柳组织含水量和膜透性的影响[J].干旱区研究,16(2):12-15.

[4] Irigoyen J J,Emerich D W and Sanchez-Diaz M.1992.Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa(Medkago sativa) plants[J].PhysiologSa plantrum,84:56-60.

[5] Ain-Lhout F,Zunzunegui I M,Diaz Barradas M C,et al.2001.Comparison of prolme accumulation in two mediterraean shrubs subjected to natural and experimental water defick[J].Plant and Soil,230:175-183.

[6] 韩蕊莲,李丽霞,梁宗锁.2003.干旱胁迫下沙棘叶片细胞膜透性与渗透调节物质研究[J].西北植物学报,23(1):23-27.

[7] Farghali,Diurnal K A.1998.Variations of chlorophyll and dry matter content of senna occidenfalis in response to zincand soil moisture[J].Biologia Plantarum,40:419-424.

[8] 薛松,王沛洪,许大全,等.1992.水分胁迫对冬小麦CO₂同化作用的影响[J].植物生理学报,18:1-7.

[9] Sangita Handa,Avtar K Handa,Paul M Hasegawa,et al.1 986.Proline accumulateion and the adaptation of cultured plant cells to water stress[J].Plant Physiql,80:938-945.

[10] 王赞,高新中,韩建国,等.2006.柠条锦鸡儿表型多样性研究[J].草地学报,14(3):201-205.

[11] 王志会,夏新莉,尹伟伦.2007.不同种源的柠条锦鸡儿的生理特性与抗旱性[J].东北林业大学学报,35(9):27-30.

[12] 宋俊双,王赞,孙家芝,等.2007.柠条锦鸡儿的组织培养[J].草地学报,15(1):66-69.

[13] 周海燕,李新荣,樊恒文,等.2005.极端条件下几种锦鸡儿属灌木的生理特性[J].中国沙漠,25(2):182-190.

[14] 张有福,陈拓,张满效,等.2006.锦鸡儿属植物抗旱性与叶片显微结构稳定性碳同位素和脯氨酸质量分数的关系研究[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),42(5):140-141.

[15] 张秀伏.1990.沙坡头沙区锦鸡儿属植物抗旱性的研究[J].中国沙漠,10(3):40-52.

[16] 叶卫英,尹林克,钱翌,等.2005.乌鲁木齐市周边荒山植物群落类型及其物种多样性[J].新疆农业大学学报,28(1):44-48.

[17] 郭卫华,李波,黄永梅,等.2004.不同程度的水分胁迫对中间锦鸡儿幼苗气体交换特征的影响[J].生态学报,24(12):2716-2722.

[18] 李合生主编.2000.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社.

[19] 王晶英,敖红,张杰,等.2003.植物生理生化实验技术与原理[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社.

[20] 马成仓,高玉葆,蒋福全,等.2004.小叶锦鸡儿和狭叶锦鸡的生态和水分调节特性比较研究[J].生态学报,(7):1442-1451.

[21] 潘瑞炽.2001.植物生理学[M].第四版,北京:高等教育出版社.

[22] 唐连顺,李广敏,裔振清,等.1992.水分胁迫对玉米幼苗膜脂过氧化及保护酶的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,15(2):34-40.

[23] Alia,Parcllaa Saradhi P,Prasanna Mohanty.1 993.Proline in relation to free radical production in seedlings of Brassia juncea raised under sodium chloride stress[J].Plant and soil,10:156-157.

[24] 姚华,赵晓英,李晓梅,等.2009.四种灌木幼苗对水分胁迫的生长响应[J].干旱区研究,26(5):720-726.