|
|
The damage of Mikania micrantha to plant communities in the Country Park of Hong Kong |
ZHOU Xian-ye1, HUANG Dong-guang2, ZAN Qi-jie3, WANG Yong-jun3, LIAO Wen-bo4 |
1. School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China; 2. The Nursery of Shenzhen Afforestation Committee of Guangdong, Shenzhen 518815, China; 3. Neilingding-Futian National Nature Reserve of Guangdong, Shenzhen 518040, China |
|
|
Abstract The damage of Mikania micrantha to different plant communities,to every plant species in communities and interspecific associations between M.micrantha and trees or shrubs in the communities were analyzed.The vegetation in study site was damaged seriously by M.micrantha.The average coverage of M.micrantha in herbaceous,shrub community and evergreen broadleaved forest was above 80%,60%,and 30%.Shrubs and trees were damaged hardest by M.micrantha in ratio and degrees of damage,while herbs and liana were damaged slightly.A total of 30 species of trees accounting for 62.5% of those in plots were damaged by M.micrantha.In comparison,29 species of shrubs accounting for 70.73% of those in plots were damaged and 10 species of herbs accounting for 33.33%.The results indicated that 12 species of trees,which accounted for 42.86% of the main trees(28 species) and most of which were heliophytes,showed positive association with M.micrantha.Of which,Leucaena glauca,Celtis austro-sinensis showed significant positive association.Sixteen species of trees,which accounted for 57.66% of the main trees,showed negative association.Cratoxylon cochinchinensis showed significant negative association with M.micrantha,while Liquidambar formasana,Viburnum odoratissimum and Machilus kwangtungensis showed significant negative association with M.micrantha.Eleven species of shrubs,which accounted for 57.89% of the main shrubs(19 species) and most of which were heliophytes,showed positive association with M.micrantha.Nine species of Lantana camara,Vitex negundo var.cannabifolia and Vitex negundo showed significant positive association with M.micrantha.Eight species of shrubs,which accounted for 42.11% of the main shrubs,showed negative association with M.micrantha.Most of them were heliophytes except Psychotria rubra that was shade-tolerant shrub.Four species,Litsea rotundifolia var.oblongifolia,Alchornea trewioides,Ilex asprella and Psychotria rubra,showed significant negative association with M.micrantha.
|
Received: 25 December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 胡玉佳,毕培曦.1994.薇甘菊生活史及其对除莠剂反应的研究[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),33(4):88~95.
[2] 孔国辉,吴七根,胡启明,等.2000.薇甘菊 Mikania micrantha H.B.K.的形态、分类与生态资料补记[J].热带亚热带植物学报,8(2):128~130.
[3] 李鸣光,张炜银,廖文波,等.2000.薇甘菊研究历史与现状[J].生态科学,19(3):41~54.
[4] Swarmy P S.1987.Weed potential of Mikania micrantha HBK.and its control in follow after shifting agriculture in northeast India[J].Agric Ecosyst Environ.18,195-204.
[5] 王伯荪,廖文波,昝启杰,等.2003.薇甘菊 Mikania micrantha在中国的传播[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),42(4):47~54.
[6] 冯惠玲,曹洪麟,梁晓东,等.2002.薇甘菊在广东的分布与危害[J].热带亚热带植物学报,10(3):263~270.
[7] 黄忠良,曹洪麟,梁晓东,等.2000.不同生境和森林内薇甘菊的生存与危害状况[J].热带亚热带植物学报,8(2):131~138.
[8] 昝启杰,王勇军,王伯荪,等.2000.外来杂草薇甘菊的分布及危害[J].生态学杂志,19(6),:58~61.
[9] 张炜银,王伯荪,廖文波,等.2002.外域恶性杂草薇甘菊研究进展[J].应用生态学报,13(12):1684~1688.
[10] 周先叶,昝启杰,王勇军,等.2003.薇甘菊在广东的传播及危害状况调查[J].生态科学,22(4):332~336.
[11] 吴世捷,高力行.2002.不受欢迎的生物多样性:香港的外来植物物种[J].生物多样性,10(1):109~118.
[12] 管东生.2001.香港山坡地草本、灌木群落的植物能量生产[J].应用生态学报,12(2):374~378.
[13] Hurlburt S.H.1969.A coefficient of interspecific association[J].Ecology,50:1~19.
[14] 杜道林,刘玉成,李睿.1995.缙云山亚热带栲树林优势种群间联结性研究[J].植物生态学报,19(2):149~157.
[15] 彭少麟,周厚诚,郭少聪,等.1999.鼎湖山地带性植被种间联结变化研究[J].植物学报,41(11):1239~1244.
[16] 刘世梁,马克明,傅伯杰,等.2003.北京东灵山地区地形土壤因子与植物群落关系研究[J].植物生态学报,27(4):496~502.
[17] 王伯荪,李鸣光,彭少麟.1995.植物种群学[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社.204~205. |
[1] |
. [J]. Ecological Science, 2019, 38(5): 30-. |
|
|
|
|