|
|
Utilization of wild plant resource in the Miao nationality resident regions of Zongdi Village in Mashan area, Guizhou Province |
WANG Ning |
1. School of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an 343009, China; 2. Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering of Jiangxi Province, Ji'an 343009, China |
|
|
Abstract The utilization of wild plants in the Miao nationality resident regions of Zongdi Village of Guizhou Province was investigated through ethnobotanical research methods. It was found that 83 species belonging to 42 families were commonly used by local people. Compositae (12 species), Liliaceae (12 species), Gramineae (5 species) and Rosaceae (5 species) were the four important families which accounted for 14.46%, 7.23%, 6.02% and 6.02% of total species respectively. The main use parts of wild plants included root (7 species), stem (33 species), phloem (3 species), leaf (26 species), flower (2 species), fruit (19 species), bud (5 species) and whole plant (16 species), accounting for 8.43%, 39.76%, 3.61%, 31.33%, 2.41%, 22.89%, 6.02% and 19.28% of total species respectively. These wild plants were classified as food plant (26 species), medicinal plant (37 species), building material plant (12 species), forage plant (9 species), craft plant (6 species), fiber plant (5 species), dry plant (3 species), oil plant (2 species), spirit plant (1 species) and entertainment plant (1 species), accounting for 31.33%, 44.58%, 14.46%, 10.84%, 7.23%, 6.02%, 3.61%, 2.41%, 1.20% and 1.20% of total species respectively. There were 6 species (7.23%) with three uses and 12 species (14.46%) with two uses. The research suggests that there are close relationships between the utilization of these wild plants and their biological characteristics, karst environment and Miao nationality culture, which also need further research.
|
Received: 25 June 2013
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Cotton, C M. Ethnobotany: principles and applications[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996: 1-3.
[2] Cunningham A B. Applied ethnobotany: people, wild plant use and conservation[M]. London: Earthscan, 2001: 1-3.
[3] 裴盛基, 淮虎银. 民族植物学[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2007: 3-4.
[4] Reddy K N, Pattanaik C, Reddy C S, et al. Traditional knowledge on wild food plants in Andhra Pradesh[J]. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 2007, 6(1): 223-229.
[5] Tardío J, Pardo-de-santayana M, Morales R. Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain[J]. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 152(1), 27-71.
[6] 裴盛基. 民族植物学研究二十年回顾[J]. 云南植物研究, 2008, 30(4): 505-509.
[7] 姚长宏, 蒋忠诚, 袁道先. 西南岩溶地区植被喀斯特效应[J]. 地球学报, 2001, 22 (2): 1-6.
[8] 龙春林, 李恒, 刀志灵, 周翊兰. 高黎贡山地区民族植物学的研究I 勒墨人[J]. 云南植物研究, 1999, 增刊 (XI): 131-136.
[9] 龙成昌, 陈训, 罗娅. 贵州喀斯特山区民族植物学研究与社区发展[J]. 云南植物研究, 2004, 增刊(XV): 101-105.
[10] 杜薇. 脆弱生态地区传统知识的挖掘与利用[M]. 成都:西南交通大学出版社, 2011: 141-149.
[11] 刘世彪, 谷忠衬, 陈功锡, 李国民, 朱杰英. 湘西州少数民族膳食结构中常见野生植物调查研究[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2002, 21(1): 41-64.
[12] 于志海, 龚双姣, 谌蓉, 曾玲, 张翼. 湘西苗族聚居地野生食用植物种类调查初报[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2006, 25(2): 33-41.
[13] 杨庭硕. 苗族生态知识在石漠化灾变救治中的价值[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007, 29(3): 24-33.
[14] 罗康隆. 麻山地区苗族复合生计克服"缺水少土"的传统生态智慧[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011, 43(1): 34-39.
[15] 中国数字植物标本馆: 贵州植物志[EB/OL]. http: //v2. cvh. org. cn/difangzhi/guizhou/list. asp. 2009-09-26/ 2012-7-8.
[16] 中国植物物种信息数据库[EB/OL]. http://db. kib. ac. cn/ eflora/ default. asp. 2012-6-1/ 2012-7-8.
[17] 李秦晋, 刘宏茂, 许又凯, 陈剑, 许再富. 西双版纳傣族利用野生蔬菜种类变化及原因分析[J]. 云南植物研究, 2007, 29(4): 467-478.
[18] 郑希龙, 陈红锋, 李榕涛, 邢福武. 海南润方言黎族药用民族植物学研究[J]. 云南植物研究, 2008, 30(2): 195-210.
[19] 郭柯, 刘长成, 董鸣. 我国西南喀斯特植物生态适应性与石漠化治理[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35 (10): 991-999.
[20] 曹明, 曹小燕, 曹利民, 席世丽. 广西恭城瑶族集市药用植物的民族植物学调查[J]. 植物分类与资源学报, 2012, 34 (1): 93-100.
[21] 罗鹏. 滇西北山地传统民族文化与生物多样性保护[D]. 昆明: 中国科学院昆明植物研究所, 2001: 74. |
[1] |
. [J]. Ecological Science, 2018, 37(5): 165-173. |
|
|
|
|