|
|
Investigation and analysis of benthons of Hengqin Island sea area in the Pearl River Estuary during spring |
Huang Dao-jian1, Du Fei-yan2, Wu Wen-cheng1 |
1. South China Institute of Environmental Sciences MEP, Guangzhou 510655, China; 2. South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510045, China |
|
|
Abstract After the investigation and analysis of benthons of Hengqin Island sea area in May 2008,33 species were found, including comate,mollusk,crustacean and Echinodermata.Comate was the dominant species,with a ratio of 42.42% of all the species.Paraprionospio pinnata,Heteromastus filiformis and Magelona crenulifrons were dominated.The total inhabitation density of benthons was 236.3 ind·m-2,and comate was the dominant species,with a ratio of 71.94% of the total inhabitation density.Besides,the total biomass of benthons was 53.0 g·m-2,and mollusk was the dominant species,with a ratio of 43.58% of the total biomass.The average diversity index and evenness of benthons were 2.62 and 0.83,respectively.Biodiversity indices showed that the area was at a lightly-moderate polluted status.Our results show a relatively higher quantity in biomass, inhabitation density,and diversity index and evenness in Hengqin Island sea area,as compared with other data from researches in the Pearl River Estuary.
|
Received: 25 April 2011
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 高爱根,董永庭,王慧珍,王永泓.南麂列岛邻近海域贝类生态分布的初步研究[J],东海海洋,1998,16(2):49-54.
[2] 谢进金,福建省泉州湾河口湿地潮间带贝类的分布[J].动物学杂志,2003,38 (3):61-264.
[3] 陈海燕.浙江省温岭海区潮间带软梯动物的调查报告[J].动物学杂志,2000,35(3):10-12.
[4] 谢进金,福建崇武潮间带滨螺科的生态研究[J].泉州师范学院学报(自然科学版),2002,20(6):66-70.
[5] 国家海洋局.GB17378.6-1998.海洋监测规范[S].北京:海洋出版社,1998.
[6] Shannon E E,Weaver W.The mathematical theory of communcation[M].London:University Illionis Press,1949.125.
[7] Pielous E C.An introduction to mathematical ecology[M].New York:Wiley-Interscience,1986.
[8] 张敬怀,高阳,方宏达,徐志斌,珠江口大型底栖生物群落生态特征[J].生态学报,2009,29(6):2989-2999.
[9] 张景平,黄小平,江志坚,黄道建,黄良民,珠江口海域污染的水质综合污染指数和生物多样性指数评价[J].热带海洋学报,2010,29(1):69-76. |
[1] |
. [J]. , 2016, 35(5): 82-89. |
|
|
|
|