重污染河道治理中的浮游动物群落结构变化研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (552 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

A composite bio-remediation technology including oxidation pond and biological restore technology in river course was employed in the treatment of polluted Guliao River of Guangzhou.Monitoring of water quality and zooplankton was conducted to compare population composition and indicator species of zooplankton at four restoration stages of the river:original water, oxidation pond, upstream and downstream areas of the restored river.The results showed that COD_Cr, BOD₅, nitrogen and phosphorus in the river water were removed gradually during the remediation process, and the diaphaneity was increased greatly, indicating that water quality was improved significantly.After the bioremediation of polluted urban river water, the zooplankton community structure changed significantly.The biodiversity and evenness were raised greatly, and the species and population of zooplankton increased considerably, especially for rotifer.In the restored river water, the predominant species of rotifer changed from Brachionus capsuliflorus to Brachionus angularis and Brachionus rubens, and the predominant species of cladocerans was Moina micrura. Naupii was dominant in quantity in the copepod zooplankton.Indicator zooplankton suitable for remediation of polluted urban river water included:Brachionus capsuliflorus, Brachionus angularis, Brachionus rubens, Keratella cochlearis, Pedalia mira, Collotheca sp., Naupii and Moina micrura.

Key words： urban river bio-remediation zooplankton community structure variation

Received: 25 October 2009

X53

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	XIE Dan-ping
	LI Kai-ming
	LIU Ai-ping

Cite this article:

XIE Dan-ping,LI Kai-ming,LIU Ai-ping. The study on variation of zooplankton community structure in bio-remediation of polluted urban river[J]. , 2009, 28(5): 398-403.

URL:

http://www.ecolsci.com/EN/ OR http://www.ecolsci.com/EN/Y2009/V28/I5/398

[1] 李开明, 刘军, 江栋, 等.2005.古廖涌黑臭水体生物修复及维护试验[J].应用与环境生物学报, 11(6):742-746.
[2] 黄燕, 黄民生, 徐亚同, 等.2007.上海城市河道治理工程简介[J].环境工程, 25(2):85-88.
[3] 申欢, 孙亚军, 胡洪营, 等.2006.滞留型城市景观河道的污染治理[J].中国给水排水, 22(20):66-68.
[4] 高思佳, 陈卫.2008.白河堡水库浮游动物调查与水质评价[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 29(3):37-40.
[5] Ibon U., Fernando V..2004.Effects of pollution on zooplankton abundance and distribution in two estuaries of the Basque coast(Bay of Biscay)[J].Marine Pollution Bulletin, 49(3):220-228.
[6] 谢进金, 许友勤, 陈寅山, 等.2005.晋江流域水质污染与浮游动物四季群落结构的关系[J].动物学杂志, 40(5):8-13.
[7] 张志杰.1990.环境生物监测[M].北京:冶金工业出
[8] 国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会.2002.水和废水监测分析方法[M].第四版.北京:中国环境科学出版社, 200-285.
[9] 江栋, 刘军, 李开明, 等.2005.黑臭河道生物修复中氧化塘应用研究[J].生态环境, 14(6):822-826.
[10] 王凤娟, 胡子全, 汤洁, 等.2006.用浮游动物评价巢湖东湖区的水质和营养类型[J].生态科学, 25(6):550-553.
[11] WU Z., LIU A., ZHANG S..2008.Short-term effects of drawing water for connectivity of rivers and lakes on zooplankton community structure[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20(4):419-423.
[12] Aitor A., Xabier I..2007.Zooplankton communities and oceanographic structures in a high-resolution grid in the south-eastern corner of the Bay of Biscay[J].Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 75(4):433-446.
[13] 宋金伟, 郑正, 任洪强, 等.2007.镇江滨水区生态修复对浮游生物多样性影响的研究[J].河南科学, 25(4):668-671.
[14] 范凯, 李清雪.2007.渤海湾浮游动物群落结构及水质生物学评价[J].安徽农业科学, 35(6):1697-1699.
[15] Snezaua C., Aleksandar M., Aleksandra D..2007.Zooplankton of the Potpec reservoir and the saprobiological analysis of water quality[J].Desalination, 213(1):24-28.
[16] 陈光荣, 钟萍, 张修峰, 等.2008.惠州西湖浮游动物及其与水质的关系[J].湖泊科学, 20(3):351-356.

[1]	. [J]. Ecological Science, 2020, 39(3): 182-.