基于能值分析的福州与厦门城市生态系统比较研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (547 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

能值分析方法(Emergy Analysis)为综合评价城市复合生态系统提供了新的手段和方法。以福州和厦门为研究对象,对其城市各种生态流进行计算和归类,建立了相应的城市复合生态系统与可持续发展能值指标,并对两城市复合生态系统中自然、经济、社会三大子系统进行了综合评价与对比分析。结果表明:厦门在经济发展水平和社会人均福利方面优于福州,在生态安全和可持续发展能力方面落后于福州。从能值角度出发,福州应加快城市基础设施建设,加强城郊地区能值反馈,科学引导人口转移;厦门应积极发展绿色产业,降低生产能耗物耗,提高废弃物循环利用率;两城市应加强区际资源互补和消除技术壁垒,促成两城市互补、互利、可持续发展。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	胡晓辉
	黄民生

关键词 ：复合生态系统, 能值分析, 可持续发展, 福州, 厦门

Abstract：

Energy Analysis Methods provide new means to evaluate urban ecosystems.Various urban ecological flows were calculated and classified for city of Fuzhou and Xiamen to establish the corresponding urban ecosystem sustainable energy evaluation indicators.Fuzhou was compared with Xiamen on the nature -economy -society complex ecosystem for comprehensive evaluation and comparative analysis.The results showed that the level of economic development and social welfare per capita in Xiamen were higher than Fuzhou,Xiamen were behind Fuzhou in the field of Ecological Safety and sustainable development capability.Therefore,Fuzhou urban infrastructure construction should be improved,energy feedback support to suburban area should be improved.Governments should pay more attention to guide population transfer;Xiamen should actively develop the green industry,reduce industrial energy consumption,reduce waste emissions and raise the level of waste reuse;Through the strengthening of resources complementarity and eliminating of technical barriers between the two cities,to promote them complement each other,mutual benefit and sustainable development.

Key words： complex ecosystem emergy analysis sustainable development Fuzhou Xiamen

收稿日期: 2007-12-25

:	Q147
	X171.1

基金资助:国家社会科学资助项目(05BJY075);福建省自然科学基金资助项目“沿海港湾区环境-经济系统能值分析和实证研究”资助(D0610004)联合资助

引用本文:

胡晓辉, 黄民生*. 基于能值分析的福州与厦门城市生态系统比较研究[J]. , 2007, 26(6): 553-558.
HU Xiao-hui, HUANG Min-sheng. A comparative study of fuzhou and Xiamen urban ecosystem based on emergy analysis. , 2007, 26(6): 553-558.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2007/V26/I6/553

[1] 杨志峰,何孟常,毛显强,等.2004.城市生态可持续发展规划[M].北京:科学出版社.

[2] 何兴元.2004.应用生态学[M].北京:科学出版社.

[3] 蓝盛芳,钦佩,陆宏芳.2002.生态经济系统能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社.

[4] 福州市统计局.2006.福州统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社.

[5] 厦门市统计局.2006.厦门经济特区年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社.

[6] 陈阜.2002.农业生态学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社.

[7] Odum H T.l996.Environmental Accounting:Emergy and Environmental Decision Making[M].New York:Johan,Wilay &Sons.

[8] Odum H T,Brown S B Williams.2000.Handbook of Emergy Evaluation Follos1[M].Gainesville FL:Center Environ Policy.

[9] Huang S L,Chia W C.2005.Theory of urban energetics and mechanisms of urban development[J].Ecological Modelling,20(1):49-71.

[10] Huang S L,Kao W C Lee C L.2007.Energetic mechanisms and development of an urban landscape system[J].Ecological Modelling,18(9):495-506.

[11] 隋春花,蓝盛芳.2006.广州与上海城市生态系统能值的分析比较[J].城市环境与城市生态,19(4):1-3.

[12] 李加林,张忍顺.2003.宁波市生态经济系统的能值分析研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,19(2):73-76.

[13] 李占玲,陈飞星,李占杰.2005.北京市城市生态系统能值分析[J].城市问题,6:25-29.

[14] 李金平,陈飞鹏,王志石.2006.城市环境经济能值综合和可持续性分析[J].生态学报,26(2):440-448.

[15] Brown M T,Ulgiati S.2001.Emergy measures of carrying capacity to evaluate economic investments[J].Population Environment,22(5):471-501.

[16] 陆宏芳,蓝盛芳,彭少麟.2003.系统可持续发展的能值评价指标的新拓展[J].环境科学,4(3):150-154.

[17] 陆宏芳,蓝盛芳.2002.评价系统可持续发展能力的能值指标[J].中国环境科学,22(4):380-384.

[18] 李秀花,吕光辉,潘晓玲.2005.城市复合生态系统能值分析及可持续发展评估--以乌鲁木齐市为例[J].农业科学研究,26(2):31-34.

[19] Jiang M M,Zhou J B,Chen B,et al.2007.Emergy-based ecological account for the Chinese economy in 2004[J].Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,25(4):1-20.