不同生境条件下中国柽柳空间分布点格局分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (852 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

通过聚类分析方法将黄河三角洲中国柽柳的生境划分为三种类型,即高盐干旱型生境,低盐干旱型生境和低盐湿润型生境;同时运用点格局分析方法,分析了不同生境中中国柽柳在不同尺度下空间分布规律,结果表明,高盐干旱和低盐干旱生境中龄级2的中国柽柳以及低盐湿润生境中龄级3的中国柽柳在所有尺度范围内都呈随机分布,而其它龄级在不同生境的空间分布规律具有较显著差异,说明黄河三角洲低龄级和高龄级中国柽柳能够通过调整空间分布模式来适应适应水盐平衡变化等生态过程;不同生境中的中国柽柳各龄级之间关系在不同尺度内呈正相关概率要大于呈负相关概率,个别尺度上某些龄级之间没有相关性.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	赵欣胜
	崔保山
	孙涛
	吕卷章

关键词 ：中国柽柳, 生境, 空间分布格局, 黄河三角洲, 湿地

Abstract：

By cluster analysis,the habitats of Tamarix chinensis in the Yellow River Delta are classified into three types:habitat with high salinity and drought condition,habitat with low salinity and drought condition,and habitat with low salinity and moist condition. Using point pattern analysis method,we analyze the spatial distribution rules of different habitats.Tamarix chinensis at different scales. The results show that in high salinity and drought habitat,as well as low salinity and drought habitat,the age class 2 T.chinensis is randomly distributed in all scales;while in low salinity and moist habitat,the age class 3 T chinensis is also randomly distributed in all scales.Distribution rules of other age class T.chinensis are significantly different in different habitats,indicating that in the Yellow River Delta the younger and senior age classes T.chinensis are able to adapt to ecological processes of water-salt balance by adjusting the spatial distribution patterns.The relationships among T.chinensis age classes in different habitats are more positively correlated,while some age classes have no relation at some spatial scales.

Key words： Tamarix chinensis habitat spatial pattern Yellow River Delta wetland

收稿日期: 2011-04-25

:	Q941.2
	Q948.11

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(50809005)

引用本文:

赵欣胜1,2*, 崔保山1, 孙涛1, 吕卷章3, 路峰3. 不同生境条件下中国柽柳空间分布点格局分析[J]. , 2011, 30(2): 142-149.
ZHAO Xin-sheng1,2, CUI Bao-shan1, SUN Tao1, Lü Juan-zhang3, LU Feng3. Analysis of spatial point pattern of Tamarix chinensis in different habitats. , 2011, 30(2): 142-149.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2011/V30/I2/142

[1] Shafroth P B,Brown C A,Merritt D M.2010,Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) and Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) in the Western United States-A report on the state ofthe science:U.S.Geological Survey Fact Sheet[R].2009-3110,4.

[2] Frasier G W,Johnsen J T N.Saltcedar (Tamarisk):Classification,distribution,ecology,and control[A].In James L F,Evans J O,Ralphs M H,Child R D.Noxious Range Weeds[C].Boulder,CO:Westview Press,1991.377-386.

[3] Cleverly J R,Dahm C N,Thibault J R,Gilroy D J,Coonrod J E A.Seasonal estimates of actual evapo-transpiration from Tamarix ramosissima stands using three-dimensional eddy covariance[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2002,52:181-197.

[4] Busch D E,Snuth S D.Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the Southwestern U.S.A[J].Ecological Monographs,1995,65(3)347-370.

[5] Lesica P,DeLuca T H.Is tamarisk allelopathic[J]?Plant and Soil,2004,267,357-365.

[6] Blackburn W H,Knight R W.Schuster J L.Saltcedar influence on sedimentation in the Brazos River[J].J Soil Water Conserv,1982,37:298-301.

[7] Busch D E,Smith S D.Effects of fire on water and salinity relations of riparian woody taxa[J].Oecologia,1993,94:186-194.

[8] Baum B R.The genus Tamarix.The Israel Academy of sciences and humanities[M].Jerusalem,lsrael.1978,209.

[9] Brock J H."Tamarix spp.(SaltCedar),an invasive exotic woody plant in arid and semi-arid riparian habitats of western USA," Pp.27-44 in Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants,Waal L C D,Child L E,Wade P M,Brock and J H,eds.New York:John Wiley ＆ Sons,Ltd.1994.

[10] Zavaleta E."Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States[A].In Invasive Species in a Changing World[C].Mooney H A,Hobbs R J,eds.Washington,D.C.:Island Press.2000.

[11] Guisan A,Weiss S B,Weiss A D.GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution[J].Plant Ecol,1999,143:107-122.

[12] Hill M O.Patterns of species distribution in Britain elucidated by canonical correspondence analysis[J].Journal of biogeography,1991,18:247-255.

[13] Brunet J.Environmental and historical factors limiting the distribution of rare forest grasses in south Sweden[J].Forest Ecology and Management,1993,61,263-275.

[14] Anke H,Stephan R.Multivariate statistics as a tool for model-based prediction of floodplain vegetation and fauna[J].Ecological Modelling,2003,169:73-87.

[15] Dieckmann U,Herben T,Law R.Spatio-temporal processes in plant communities[A].In:Lepenies W.Yearbook 1995/1996,Institute for Advanced Study Berlin[C].Berlin,Germany:Nicolaische Verlagsbuchhandlung,1997,296-326.

[16] Cressie N A C.Statistics for spatial data.Wiley[A].Dale M R T.1999.In:Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology[C].ambridge Univ.Press,1991.283-284.

[17] Ter Braak C J F.Canonical correspondence analysis:a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis[J].Ecology,1986,67:116-117.

[18] Diggle P J.Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns[M].New York:A cademic Press,1983.

[19] Barot S,Gignoux J,Menaut J C.Demography ofa savanna palm tree:Predictions from comprehensive spatial pattern analyses[J].Ecology,1999,80:1987-2005.

[20] 郝占庆,郭水良.长白山北坡草本植物分布与环境关系的典范对应分析[J],生态学报,2003,23(10):2000-2008.

[21] 刘振国,李镇清.不同放牧强度下冷蒿种群小尺度空间格局[J].生态学报,2004,24(2):227-235.

[22] 张金屯,孟东平.芦芽山华北落叶松林不同龄级立木的点格局分析[J].生态学报,2004,24(1):35-40.

[23] 张金屯,植被数量生态学方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995.50-100.

[24] 张金屯.植物种群空间分布的点格局分析[J].植物生态学报,1998,22(4):344-349.

[25] Ripley B D.The second order analysis of stationary point process[J].Journal of Applied Probabilty,1976,13:255-266.

[26] Gaskin J F,Schaal B A.Hybrid Tamarix widespread in U.S.invasion and undetected in native Asian range[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of theUnited States of America,2002,99:11256-11259.

[27] Schmidt K M.Relationship of salinity and depth to the water table on Tamarix spp.(Saltcedar) growth and water use[Z].Masters thesis,Texas A＆M University.Available electronically from http://handle.tamu.edu/1969.1/473.2003.12.1.

[28] William D.Wiesenbom.Saltcedar Impacts on Salinity,Water,Fire Frequency and Flooding.Bureau of Reclamation,Boulder City NV[R].Saltcedar Management Workshop,June 12,1996.

[29] JacksonJ,Ball J T,Rose M R.Assessment of the Salinity Tolerance of Eight Sonoran Desert Riparian Trees and Shrubs[R].Final Report for Bureau of Reclamation,Yuma Projects Office,Yuma,rizona,1990,102.

[30] Wiesenbom W D.Saltcedar impacts on salinity,water,fire frequency,and flooding[R].Saltcedar Management Workshop 3,1996.

[31] Schlesinger W,Raikes J,Hartley A,Cross A F.On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems[J].Ecology,1996,77,364-374.

[32] Allee W C.Animal aggregations:a study in general sociology[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press.1931.

[33] Abdel-Razik M,Abdel-Azu M,Ayyad M.Environmental gradients and species distribution in a transect at Omayed (Egypt)[J].Journal of Arid Environment,1984,7:337-352.

[34] Dale W F,Lynn E N,Adam H F.Environmental gradients,plant distribution,and species richness in arctic salt marsh near Prudhoe Bay,Alaska[J].Wetlands Ecology and Management,2004,12:215-233.

[35] Isabel Cacador,Tibe' rio S,Cabral H N.Species zonation in Corroios salt marsh in the Tagus estuary (Portugal) and its dynamics in the past fifty years[J].Hydrobiologia,2007,587:205-211.