不同干扰措施对松材线虫入侵松林内物种多样性的影响

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (409 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

经野外调查发现:松材线虫入侵松林后,对原先林型相同的两块染病松林而言,经过人为伐除和保留受害木这两种干扰措施后,任其自然恢复更新,后恢复的林型会大不相同,即对受害木采取不同的干扰措施会对染病松林内林下植被的更新产生不同的影响.基于以上出发点,以松材线虫入侵后采取不同伐除干扰措施的2个马尾松受害群落为研究对象,针对受害木移除和保留两种处理方式,选择α多样性指数函数Rényi指数为测量单位,探讨了不同受害木处理方式下植物多样性的变化规律.结果表明:受害木及时移走的松林内林下灌草多样性比受害木保留的要高.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	石娟
	骆有庆
	严晓素
	陈卫平

关键词 ：松材线虫, 入侵, 马尾松林, 伐除, 干扰措施

Abstract：

Through field investigations it was observed that after Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhren) Nickle (pine wood nematode) invaded a pine forest, subsequently formed forest types would be significantly different from each other if two managing ways such as human removal and reserving damaged trees were taken before a natural regeneration, namely different disturbance measures taken for damaged trees would affect regeneration direction of understory vegetation of an infected pine forest. Based on the above observation, the dynamics of plant diversity under different managements of damaged trees were studied by choosing two Masson pine communities that were subjected to managements of removal and reserving damaged trees, respectively, after the invasion of pine wood nematode. α diversity index function-Rényi index was used as a measurement. The results showed that the species diversity of shrub and herb layers of the pine forest in which damaged trees were removed timely was higher than that in which damaged trees were reserved.

Key words： Bursaphelenchus xylophilus invasion masson pine forest removal disturbance ways

收稿日期: 2007-08-25

X173

基金资助:国家科技支撑计划(2006BAD08A15);中国外来入侵物种及其安全性考察(2006FY111000)

引用本文:

石娟1, 骆有庆1*, 严晓素2, 陈卫平2, 蒋平2. 不同干扰措施对松材线虫入侵松林内物种多样性的影响[J]. , 2007, 26(4): 289-292.
SHI Juan1, LUO You-qing1, YAN Xiao-su2, CHEN Wei-ping2, JIANG Ping2. Effects of different disturbance ways on the diversity of pine forest invaded by pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). , 2007, 26(4): 289-292.

链接本文:

http://www.ecolsci.com/CN/Y2007/V26/I4/289

[1] Curnutt J L.2000.Host-area specific climatic-matching:Similarity breeds exotics[J].Biol Conserv,94:341-351.

[2] 柴希民,蒋平.2003.松材线虫病的发生和防治[M].北京:中国农业出版社.7,147,155-156.

[3] 安徽农学院林学系编.1980.马尾松[M].北京:中国林业出版社.23.

[4] 蒋平,赵锦年,柴希民,等.2001.松材线虫病综合防治技术研究[J].浙江林业科技,21(4):1-6.

[5] 刘志民,赵晓英,刘新民.2002.干扰与植被的关系[J].草业学报,11(4):1-9.

[6] 浙江省林业厅区划办公室编.1991.浙江省林业区划[M].北京:中国林业出版社.40-43

[7] Patil G P,Taillie C.1977.Diversity as a concept and its implications for random communities[J].Bull.Int.Stat.Inst.,47:497-515.

[8] Patil G P,Taillie C.1979.An overview of diversity[A].In:Grassle J F,Patil G P,Smith W,Taillie C (ed).Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice[C].Fairland,MD:International Cooperative Publishiing House.3-27.

[9] Patil G P,Taillie C.1982.Diversity as a concept and its measurement[J].J.Am.Sta.Ass.,77:548-567.

[10] Tóthmérész B.1993.DIVORD 1.50:a program for diversity ordering[J].Tiscia,27:33-44.

[11] Tóthmérész B.1995.Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering[J].J Veg Sci,6:283-290.

[12] Tóthmérész B.1994.Div Ord 1.60:Diversity ordering:finite and infinite samples[J].Tiscia,28:63-65.

[13] 杨清培,李鸣光,张炜银,等.2000.黑石顶自然保护区未受干扰与人为干扰马尾松林物种多样性比较[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),39(2):87-92.

[14] 石娟,骆有庆,宋冀莹,等.2006.松材线虫入侵后实施不同伐倒干扰强度对马尾松林植物多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,17(7):1157-1163.

[15] You Min sheng.1998.Development of studies on the community diversity[J].福建农业大学学报,27(4):432-439.

[16] 王寿兵.2003.对传统生物多样性指数的质疑[J].复旦学报(自然科学版),42(6):867-868.

[17] Tóthmérész B.1993.Nu CoSA 1.00.Number cruncher for community studies and other applications[J].Abstr.Bot,17:283-287.

[18] Odum E P.1969.The strategy of ecosystem development[J].Science,164:262-270.

[19] 孔国辉,莫江明.2002.人为干扰对鼎湖山马尾松林种群动态的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报,10(3):193-200.

[20] 盛炜彤,杨承栋.1997.关于杉木林下植被对改良土壤性质效用的研究[J].生态学报,17(4):377-385.