[1] Arrhenius O. 1921. Species and area[J]. Journal of ecology. 9:95-99
[2] Case T. 1991. Invasion resistance, species build-up and community collapse in metapopulation models with interspecies competion[J]. Biol. J. Limn. Soc. 42:239-266
[3] Caswell H and Cohen J E. 1991. Disturbance,interspecific interaction and diversity in metapopulations[J]. Biol. J. Limn. Soc, 42:193-218
[4] Connell J H. and Slatyer R O. 1977. Mechanisms of successionin natural communities and their role in community stability and organization[J]. Am. Nat.,111:1119-1144
[5] Connell J H. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees[A]. In:DenBoer P J and Gradwell G R(ed.). Dynamics of populations[C]. Wageningen:Pudoc. 298-312
[6] Connor E F. and McCoy E D. 1979. The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship[J]. Am. Nat. 113:791-833
[7] Davies K F, Melbourne B A, Margules C R.2001. Effects of within-and between-patch processes on community dynamics in a fragmen tation experiment[J]. Ecology,82,(7):1830-1846
[8] Gaston K J. 1994. Rarity[M]. Chapman and Hall,London.
[9] Gutierrez D; Leon-Cortes JL and Menendez R etc. 2001. Metapop ulations of four lepidopteran herbivores on a single host plant, Lotus comiculatus[J]. Ecology,82(5):1371-1386
[10] Gyllenberg,M. and Hanski,I. 1992. Single-species metapopulation dynamics:a structured model[J]. Theor. Pop. Biol. 72:35-61
[11] Hanski I. 1982a. Dynamics of regional distribution:the core andsatellite species hypothesis[J]. Oikos. 38:210-221
[12] Hanski I. 1994a. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics[J]. J. Anim. Ecol. 63:151-162
[13] Hanski I. 1994c. Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragemented land scapes[J]. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:131-135
[14] Hanski I. and Gyllenberg M. 1997. Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species[J]. Science. 275:397-400
[15] Holt R D. 1995. Demographic constrainta in evolution:towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senesence and the niche conservatism[J]. Evol. Ecology,10:1-11
[16] Holt R D. 1997. From metapopulation danamics to community structure:some consequences of spatial heterogeneity[A]. In:I A Hanski and M E Gilpin(ed.). Metapopulation Ecology[C].San Diego:Academic Press. 149-165
[17] Huston M. 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity[J]. Am. Nat.,113:81-101
[18] Klausmeier CA.2001. Habitat destruction and extinction in competitive and mutualistic metacommunities[J]. Ecology Letters, 4(1):57-63
[19] Lawton J H. 1993. Range, population abundance and conservation[J]. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:409-413
[20] Levins R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of enviromental hetergeneity for bioligical control[J]. Bull Ento mol. Soc. Amer. 15:237-240
[21] MacArthur R H. and Wilson E O. 1967. The theory of island bio geography[M]. Princeton University Press
[22] Moulton M P. and Pimm S L. 1983. The introduced Hawaiian avifauna:biogeographic evidence for competition[J]. Am. Nat.121:669-690
[23] Preston F W. 1960. Time and space and the variation of species[J]. Ecology. 41:611-627
[24] Rosenzweig M L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time[M]. Cambridge University Press
[25] Schoener T W. 1976. The species-area relation within archipela gos:models and evidence from island and land birds[A]. 16th international ornithological congress[C]. 629-641
[26] Williams C B. 1943. Area and number of species[J]. Nature. 152:264-267
[27] Williams M R. 1995. An extreme-value function model of the species incidence and species-area relations[J]. Ecology. 76:2607-2616
[28] Wissel, C. and Maier, B. 1992. A stochastic model for the speciesarea relationship[J]. Journal of Biogeography. 19:355-362 |