茂名大雾岭中次生林植被蚯蚓多样性的空间特征

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (436 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

Investigations were made on plant diversity, earthworm diversity, and soil organic matter in different directions of natural secondary forest in Dawuling Mountains. Four slopes,east-facing slope (EFS),south-facing slope (SFS),west-facing slope (WFS), and north-lacing slope (NFS) of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill,were sampled. In the Dawuling Mountain, 1)the number of tree was lower on SFS that other directions, the densities of on SFS of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill being 0 Ind·m^-2 and 0.06 Ind·m^-2, respectively, but there was no difference of tree diversity among directions, Shannon-Weaver index of tree ranging from 0 to 2.24, Margalef index from 0 to 3.15; 2) the number of shrub was not dominant in any directions, but SFS had the lowest shrub diversity, Shannon-Weaver index and Margalef index of SFS of Datianding Hill being 1.52 and 1.70, respectively, those of Qieding Hill being 2.05 and 2.33, respectively; 3) the number of herb on SFS was the highest among those or all directions, the densities of herb on SFS of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill being 87 Ind·m^-2, and 44 Ind·m^-2,respectively, and SFS also had the highest herb diversity, Shannon-Weaver index and Margalef index of herb on SFS of Datianding Hill being 2.46 and 3.36, respectively; 4) the number of earthworm was low on SFS. the densities of earthworm on SFS of Datianding Hill and Qieding Hill being 7 Ind·m^-2 and 0 Ind·m^-2, respectively, but the earthworm diversities was insignificantly influenced by direction, Shannon-Weaver index of earthworm ranging from 0 to 1.63. Margalef index from 0 to 2.20; and 5) direction had no influence on the content of soil organic matter, and the soil within 50 cm from the surface had 11.2～40.6% of organic matter, that between 50 cm and 100 cm from the surface having 5.6～17.5% of organic matter. Because of direction effects on biological sources, different methods should be used to manage natural secondary forest according to slope-exposure.

Key words： Dawuling Mountains Secondary forest Direction Biodiversity

Received: 25 August 2003

Q145+.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	FAN Ming-ming
	XU Zhong-neng
	QIU Ming-xia
	LI Wan-hua
	MA Ai-neng
	HUANG Ze-qi
	HUANG Tao

Cite this article:

FAN Ming-ming,XU Zhong-neng,QIU Ming-xia, et al. Direction effects on plant diversity, earthworm diversity, and soil organic matter of natural secondary forest in dawuling mountains[J]. , 2003, 22(4): 294-299.

URL:

http://www.ecolsci.com/EN/ OR http://www.ecolsci.com/EN/Y2003/V22/I4/294

[1] 黄世国,林思祖,曹光球,等.2001.不同生境中杉阔混交林物种多样性特征初步研究[J].生物多样性,9(2):162-167.

[2] 沈泽昊,张新时,金义兴.2000.三峡大老岭森林物种多样性的空间格局分析及其地形解释[J].植物学报,42(6):620-627.

[3] 郭晋平,王俊田,李世光.2000.关帝山林区景观要素沿环境梯度分布趋势的研究[J].植物生态学报,24(2):135-140.

[4] 陈桂珠.1997.大雾岭省级自然保护区综述[M].大雾岭省级自然保护区综合考察文集.

[5] 娄安如.1996.神农架3种天然次生林的种群结构和演替趋势[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),32(1):124-128.

[6] 沈泽昊,张新时.2000.基于植物分布地形格局的植物功能型划分研究[J].植物学报,42(11):1190-1196.

[7] 张宝贵,李贵桐,申天寿.2000.威廉环毛蚓对土壤微生物量及活性的影响.生态学报,20(1):168-172.

[8] 姜培坤,钱新标,余树金,等.1999.千岛湖地区天然次生林地枯落物与土壤状况地调查分析[J].浙江林学院学报,16(3):260-264.

[9] Meir F,ori F,Eviatar N.2001.Biodiversity and interslope divergence of vascular plants caused by sharp microclimatic differences at "Evolution Canyon Ⅱ",Lower Nahal Keziv,Upper Galilee,Israel[J].Israel Journal of Plant Sciences,49(4):285-295.

[10] Huston M.1994.Biological diversity,soils,and economics[J]Science,262:1676-1679.

[11] Ludwig K.2002.Perspectives on secondary forest management in tropical humid lowland America[J].Ambio,31(3):243-250.

[12] Zarin D J,Ducey M J,Tucker J M,et al.2001.Potential biomass accumulation in Amazonian regrowth forests[J].Ecosystems,4(7):658-668.

[13] Nachtergale L,Ghekiere K,De Schrijver A,et al.2002.Earthworm biomass and species diversity in windthrow sitesof a temperate lowland forest[J].Pedobiologia,46(5):440-451.

[14] Compton J E,Boone R D.2002.Soil nitrogen transfo rmations and the role of light fraction organic matter in fo rest soils[J].Soil biology & Biochemistry,34(7):933-943.

[15] Singh G,Singh B,Kuppusamy V,et al.2002.Variations in foliage and soil nutrient composition in Acacia tortilis planatationof different ages in north-western Rajasthan[J].Indian Forester,128(5):514-522.

[16] Kaiser K,Eusterhues K,Rumpel C,et al.2002.Stabilizationoforganic matter by soil minerals:Investigations of density and particle-size fractions from two acid forest soils[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,165(4):451-459.

[17] Critchley C N R,Chambers B J,Fowbert J A,et al.2002.Plant species richness,functional type and soil properties of grasslands and allied vegetation in English environmentally sensitive areas[J].Grass and Forage Science,57(2):82-92.

[18] Wezel A,Steinmueller N,Friederichsen J R.2002.Slope position effects on soil fertility and crop productivity and implications for soil conservation in upland northwest Vietnam[J].Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,91(1-3):113-126.

[19] Heredia W,Peitano P,Borie G,et al.2002.Soil organic matter-metal interactions in Chilean volcanic soils under different agronomic management[J].Communicationsin Soil Science and Plant Analysis,33(13-14):2083-2099.

[1]	. [J]. Ecological Science, 2020, 39(1): 213-.