The diagnosis of soil contamination is one of the most important component parts in soil cleanup processes. However, the diagnosis using only chemical methods could not express and demonstrate the holistic characteristic of soil quality. It is thus necessary to develop ecotoxicological diagnosis methods. The particularity and importance of research on ecotoxicological diagnoses of contaminated soils was expounded,the advisement and guidelines of building up ecotoxicological diagnosis methods of contaminated soils were summarized, and current research situation in this field at home and abroad was reviewed. Future research directions were also suggested.
[11] Anderson K, Giller A. 1999. Toxicological study of two novel pes ticides on earthworm Eisenia Foetide[J]. Chemosphere,39:2150～2156
[12] Battersby N S. 1997. Estimation of hazard of landfill through toxi city test[J]. Chemoshphere,35:2783～2796
[13] Bubus R, Hund K. 1997. Development of analytical methods for the assessment of ecotoxicological relevant soil contamination. Part B:Ecotoxicological analysis in soil and soil extracts[J]. Chemosphere,35:237～261
[14] haman P M. 1995. Extropolating laboratory toxicity results to the field[J]. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14:927～930
[15] Chang L W,Meier J R, Smith M K. 1997. Application of plant and earthworm bioassays to evaluate remediation of a lead-contam inated soil[J]. Arch. Environ. Toxicol.,32:166～171
[16] Depledge M H. 1990. New approaches in ecotoxicology:Can inter-individual physiological variability be used as a tool to investigate pollution effects[J]. AMBIO,19:251～252
[17] Fouchecourt M O, Riviere J L. 1996. Activities of liver and lung cytochrome P450-dependentmonooxygenases and antioxident enzymes in laboratory and wild Norway rats exposed to reference and contaminated soils[J]. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,30:51～57
[18] Gehrke U,Michels J. 1999. Processes for the bioremediation of soil. Federal Environmental Agency and Federal Ministry of Edu cation, Science, Research and Technology(BMBF), P6～40
[19] Giller K E,Witter E, McGrath S P. 1998. Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils:A review[J]. Soil Biol. Technol.,30:1389～1414
[20] Greene,J C,Bartels C L,Perterson S A. 1988. Protocols for short term toxicity screening of hazardous waste sites. US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/6003-88/029
[21] Hull S R, Laine R A. 1984. Structures of the linked oli geosacharides of the major cell structure sialoglycoprotein of MAT-B1 and MAT-C1 ascites sublines of the 13762 rat mammary adenocarcinma[J]. J. Biolo. Chem.,259:4866～4877
[22] ISO(International Organizations for Standardization). 1993. Soil quality-determination of the effects of pollutants on soil flora. Part 1:Method for the measurement of inhabitation of root growth. ISO 1269-1
[23] ISO(International Organizations for Standardization). 1995. Soil quality-determination of the effects of pollutants on soil flora. Part 2:Effects of chemicals on the emergence and growth of higher plants. ISO 11269-2
[24] Jane M,Mattna I. 1999. Impact of long-term weathering,mobili ty,and land use on chlordane residues in soil[J]. Environ. Sci.Technol.,33:2426～2431
[25] Kipopoulou A M. 1999. Bioconcentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in vegetatables grown in an industrial area[J]. Environmental pollution, 106:369～380
[26] Knoke K L,Marwood T M. 1999. Acomparison of five bioassays to monitor toxicity during bioremediation of pentachlorophenol-con taminated soil[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 110:157～169
[27] Poosthuma L. 1997. Progrees in an eco-toxicological standard pro tocol with protozoa:results from a pilot ring-test with soil protozoa[J]. Chemosphere,35:1023～1041
[28] Price C E. 1984. Higher plant test guideline ring test. EEC tinal report. Contract XI AL(83) 647 N(290),AER Consultants,Mud Lane, Eversley, Hants, UK
[29] Puurtinen H M, Martikainen E A T. 1997. Effect of soil moisture on pesticide toxicity to an enchytraeid worm, enchytraeus sp[J]. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.,33:34～41
[30] Ronco A E. 1992. Development of a bioassay regent using photo bacterinm phosphreum as a test for the detection of aquatic toxi cants[J]. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology,8:316～318
[31] Roos P H,Van Afferden M,Strotkamp D,et al. 1996. Liver microsomal levels of cytochrome P450IA1 as biomarker for exposure and bioavalability of soil-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[J]. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,30:107(113
[32] Siciliano S D, Gong P. 2000. Assessment of 2,4,6-trinitro toluene toxicity in field soils by pollution-induced community toler ance, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and seed germination assay[J]. Environmental toxicology and Chemistry, 19:2154～2160
[33] Spurgeon D J, Hopkin S P. 1999. Tolerance to zinc in populations of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus from uncontaminated and metal-contaminated ecosystems[J]. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.,37:332～337
[34] Steinberg C, Kettrup A. 1992. Proceedings international Sympo sium on Ecotoxicology-Ecotoxicological relevance of test meth ods[C]. GSF-Bericht 1
[35] Tarazona J V, Fresno A, Aycard S, et al. 2000. Assessing the po tential hazard of chemical substances for the terrestrial environ mental:Development of hazard classification criteria and quantita tive environmental indicators[J]. The Science of the Total Envi ronment,247:151～164
[36] Thoma M C. 1997. Special report on environmental endocrine dis ruption:an effects assessment and analysis[C]. USEPA Risk as sessment forum
[37] Van Beelen P, Doelman P. 1997. Significance and application of microbial in soil and sediment[J]. Chemoshpere,34:455～499
[38] Walker C H. 1995. Biomarkers in ecotoxicology-some recent de velopments[J]. J. Sci. Total Environ.,171:189～195
[39] Walker C H. 1998. The use of biomarkers to measure the interac tive effects of chemicals[J]. J. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.,40:65～70
[40] Wilke, B-M. 1997. Project Organization Waster Management and Contaminated Site Reclamation[C], Federal Ministry for Ed ucation, Science, Research and Technology, Germany,353～354
